Doing Things Wrong

Kubicki Factor Bass (1/13)

Sort of like a Kubicki, but not really.

image
The original Tung-oil finish, kind of blah

Back in the glorious 80s, Kramer tried to cash in on the headless craze with a widely unpopular model called "The Duke":

image

Apparently, it started out as an 8-string that went bad. One of the workers sawed off the body wings and headstock, and "The Duke" was born. There was also a guitar version. "The Duke" incorporated all of the worst aspects of a Steinberger, and none of the good, like the super-precise tuning. However, it is an interesting idea that could be done much better.

image

Note the real bass tuners, with much less string fan-out than the Kramer, despite the fact that Kramer used much smaller guitar tuners. I scanned four copies of a spare machine from the parts box, and fooled around with them until I got it as tight as possible. The tuner spacing is ~24mm; the bridge is 19mm, so the outer ones are about 8 degrees off-angle. Why Kramer couldn't do this is a mystery to me.

image
 1 2 3  13  

Comments on Kubicki Factor Bass

Questions or Inquiries?

Just want to say Hello? Sign the .

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Click image to replace if unable to read.

Enter the digits from the image above, except for the last one:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


There is a lot of nonsense that gets floated through the guitar industry about neck mountings, mostly invented by marketing departments to justify outlandish prices. 'Set' and 'through' necks are simply luthiery baggage from the middle ages, literally, as in 500 years ago before screws had been invented, or at least were in common use. Any difference in tone or sustain is purely imaginary on the part of the sucker who paid an extra thousand dollars for it, and has no choice but to believe the BS or admit he was had.