Doing Things Wrong

Kubicki Factor Bass (1/13)

Sort of like a Kubicki, but not really.

image
The original Tung-oil finish, kind of blah

Back in the glorious 80s, Kramer tried to cash in on the headless craze with a widely unpopular model called "The Duke":

image

Apparently, it started out as an 8-string that went bad. One of the workers sawed off the body wings and headstock, and "The Duke" was born. There was also a guitar version. "The Duke" incorporated all of the worst aspects of a Steinberger, and none of the good, like the super-precise tuning. However, it is an interesting idea that could be done much better.

image

Note the real bass tuners, with much less string fan-out than the Kramer, despite the fact that Kramer used much smaller guitar tuners. I scanned four copies of a spare machine from the parts box, and fooled around with them until I got it as tight as possible. The tuner spacing is ~24mm; the bridge is 19mm, so the outer ones are about 8 degrees off-angle. Why Kramer couldn't do this is a mystery to me.

image
 1 2 3  13  

Comments on Kubicki Factor Bass

Questions or Inquiries?

Just want to say Hello? Sign the .

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Click image to replace if unable to read.

Enter the digits from the image above, except for the last one:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Solid poplar body, lightly stained and finished in polyurethane. Korean Squire neck, active electronics. Is it a reverse, or a non-reverse? Since this is a reverse of the original Thunderbird body ( more-or-less ) I say it is a reverse. If this is a non-reverse, then the original would have to be the reverse. Reverse of what? Makes no sense.

Printed from luthierylabs.com