Doing Things Wrong

Rickenbacker 325 Bass 2 (1/8)

Well, it's that time of year again, time to renew the web hosting. And for those of you that don't know, that has become a lot more expensive than it used to be. Fifty dollars a year is now several hundred. Not to mention the price of domain names has gone up ten-fold.

And I just found out that the nice folks at PayPal disabled all my Support buttons, and I never got a notice (although that may be my fault.) In any case, it is all working again now, so if you would like to make a small donation to help defray these costs, it would be greatly appreciated.

These were my first two tries at a 325 bass. Both are plywood over pine hollow-bodies. The one on the left - #1 - used an experimental neck mounting that I didn't like. The one on the right - #2 - suffered a router mishap. I took all the good parts and built the solid-body, and both of these bodies spent years on the scrap heap.

image
#1 on the left, #2 on the right

One day I decided "what the heck?" and finished them. I converted the neck mount on the smaller one to a conventional bolt-on, and added a raised center section to the big one to correct some geometry problems. Then I refinished both and sanded them to a nice even satin.

The short-scale neck was originally made to fit the bigger body, but I made it fit the smaller one, and then made a new 32" neck for the bigger body from some wood that had lain around for years because I didn't like it. The new neck came out much better than I expected.

Both got cheap Chinese pickups, dry-erase pickguards, and minimal electronics. The aluminum plate on the smaller one covers the rout for the Rickenbacker bridge. The bigger one got a heavy-weight bridge and some scrap metal glued inside to correct the balance. They're both really great players, especially the bigger one.

The walnut wings on the headstocks are scrap from the original Audiovox project.

 1 2 3  8  

Comments on Rickenbacker 325 Bass 2

Questions or Inquiries?

Just want to say Hello? Sign the .

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Click image to replace if unable to read.

Enter the digits from the image above, except for the last one:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


There are two components to intonation. The first is simple - locating the bridge at the right spot. You'd think that would be obvious, you'd be surprised how often it is gotten wrong. Like my Rickenbacker. The second part is the additional length or 'compensation' needed for each string beyond the scale length. That derives from the string's mechanical resistance to bending, or its stiffness, which is proportional to its diameter. That's why the low fat strings need more compensation than the thinner ones - shortening the string increases its relative stiffness, or the ratio of diameter to length, and causes it to go sharp as you go up the neck. I have never seen a negative compensation, I think theoretically it should not exist.

Printed from luthierylabs.com