Doing Things Wrong

Audiovox Batch Builds (3/5)

Jun 30, 2016

image

Here is a guitar neck fixed in my neck routing jig. I just cut a 1/2" square channel for one of the steel bars. A $5 piece of steel from Home Depot will make two of these. I degrease it and then scratch it up good on the belt sander. This is how the Martin company did truss rods many years ago, before it became impossible to market a guitar without an adjustable truss rod. I did some calculations, and this square tube turns out to be 37% stiffer and 12% lighter than a pair of 1/8"x1/2" steel rods ( like a Danelectro. ) It is also easier to install, with just one centered channel instead of two offset angled ones.

image

Here is the rod being glued in. I used regular wood glue. It will grab well enough at the scratched steel, and when the neck is done, the rod will be completely encapsulated in wood. No messy epoxy, this is good enough. Sixty years ago, Danelectro was building necks like this with hide glue, and it worked just fine. Many of those necks are as straight today as the day they were made. The clamps are there because the wet glue tends to swell the wood, causing the neck to cup. Once the glue is dry, it is no longer a problem, and this neck will stay dead straight until the wood rots away.

The bending stresses on a guitar or bass neck are actually quite small, the problem is that in the long run even the strongest wood will not withstand a bending force without deflecting. That is where the steel comes it - steel is hundreds of times stronger than wood, and will stay straight under these circumstances forever. I find that a guitar can be set up to play quite well with a dead straight neck, so that is how I build them. Any adjustment can be made by shimming the heel, and usually, none is needed.

The strength of this neck is now essentially the strength of the steel bar. The greatest danger is making the back of the neck too thin, so that the rod pulls through the wood. As this is 3/4" lumber, I should have about 1/4" of wood behind the truss rod. I wouldn't want to make that any less than 1/8". I like chunky necks anyway.

For a fixed rod like this to work, it has to flex a tiny bit to generate the internal stresses that will resist the bending force. The resulting deflection is too small for me to measure. At the same time, it can't flex too much, so it really needs to be over-strong, and I don't think anything less than 1/2" will do. An adjustable truss rod can be pre-stressed. As none of these stresses come anywhere near the limit of the material, an adjustable rod can therefore be smaller than a fixed one, lending itself to a thinner neck.

However, construction requirements also come into play, so the height savings are less than you'd think. Most double-acting truss rods are about 5/16" in height. My best design is 3/8". The thinnest rod I've seen is a Rickenbacker, about 1/4". But Ric rods are only single-acting and are notoriously delicate, such that they generally have to be installed in pairs. I would never build a truss rod like that.

The Audiovox basses will get more-normal adjustable rods, as a small amount of front bow is desirable on a bass. My experience is that a short-scale bass must have a double-acting truss rod, as the string tension is not enough to guarantee that the neck will bow forward on its own, I have seen ones that need a little push.

For the basses, I am using standard Chinese double-acting truss rods that I shorten to fit. To do that, I saw most of the way through the rod, leaving just a tiny neck to keep the pieces aligned. Then I braze the two pieces together and cut away the excess, and finally grind the end smooth. It's much easier than building a rod from scratch, all you need is a standard acetylene torch and some high-strength silver solder, not the kind plumbers use.

image

Here are all the Audiovox necks, and a few of the pickguards that I've started to assemble. I am keeping the wiring deliberately simple. This design is pretty tight for controls, and I want to keep them out of the way so they don't get hit by accident while playing. The original 736 had just one big volume knob. I added a concentric tone and pickup switch, for a basic modern setup. The one on the left is a Fender Jazz bass stacked set; the middle one is straight Danelectro, and the one on the right is a hybrid.

Next up: mark out and drill 36 tuner holes. It is easier to do things batch-style like this. There is less setting-up, and it lets you get in a groove. But this seems like it is taking forever. I think I will concentrate on the two solid bodies, so I can finally have something finished.

image

These are coming along nicely, just about ready for final finishing. The decals are laser-printed on blank decal material and applied over a base coat of poly. They will get thickly over-coated with more poly, then polished smooth. You can get the material from a hobby shop or online, also available for inkjets.

image

Oct 29, 2017

image

Tutmarc uke bass

Just laying all the parts together. The neck is not fretted yet. Today I made the bridge from scraps of fretboard wood. The circuit board is the buffer for the piezo. The body is plywood over pine. I think it needs a sound hole to fill in the blank space.


Nov 20, 2017

image

This is the third one I've finished to my modified design, plus one other that is closer to the original. This "Modern Player" design is better in every way.


Jan 18, 2018

image
image

I've always loved these. Never owned a Ric 12, not a millionaire, and they are reputedly very bad players. I once built a six-string to Ric specs, and it was awful. I rebuilt it to Fender specs, and it turned out great.

The first time I did interleaved tuners like this, I used six-on-a-plate tuners. Big mistake - you have to get the hole spacing perfect, I mean perfect, or the tuners won't go on. Even after building a special jig for it, I still had to do a lot of adjusting to make it work. ( Strat headstock, all on one side, much cooler than an actual Fender 12. )

This was much easier. I can tell the spacing is not perfect, and it doesn't matter. I love the way these open-gear tuners look, especially crowded together like this, very steampunk. I had to disassemble half of them and flip them, the whole job took maybe half an hour. This sort of headstock ends up being about an inch longer than a standard six, although noticeably heavier.

The fretboard is walnut from the hobby store, sealed with polyurethane. The frets are hanging in there just fine, why wouldn't they? The body will be the same construction as the Uke. After this, I have four more in the pipeline, and this is not the craziest one. I've had these in work for several years now, but get busy with other things. Hopefully, I can get this one together in the next few days.

 1 2 3 4 5  

This is my attempt to recreate my very first bass, a "Montaya", as well as one of my first ventures into 'modding'. These SX's are great instruments. For 109 bucks you get an alder body with a beautiful 3-tone sunburst, a decent neck, functional bridge & tuners, and a flawless finish. What you don't get is any kind of useable pickups or strings. On this one, I installed a USA Fender pickup, my favorite d'Addario strings, and gave it a careful fret dressing and setup. I also added the tortoise pickguard, rosewood thumbrest, and ashtray for the looks only. At the time, I was going purely from memory, but I later found a picture of the original, and I got it dead right.

Printed from luthierylabs.com